Model Context Protocol (MCP) vs Function Calling vs OpenAPI Tools — When to Use Each?

• MCP (Model Context Protocol): Open, transport-agnostic protocol that standardizes discovery and invocation of instruments/assets throughout hosts and servers. Best for moveable, multi-tool, multi-runtime methods.
• Function Calling: Vendor characteristic the place the mannequin selects a declared perform (JSON Schema), returns arguments, and your runtime executes. Best for single-app, low-latency integrations.
• OpenAPI Tools: Use OpenAPI Specification (OAS) 3.1 because the contract for HTTP companies; agent/tooling layers auto-generate callable instruments. Best for ruled, service-mesh integrations.

Comparison Table

Concern	MCP	Function Calling	OpenAPI Tools
Interface contract	Protocol information mannequin (instruments/assets/prompts)	Per-function JSON Schema	OAS 3.1 doc
Discovery	Dynamic by way of instruments/listing	Static listing supplied to the mannequin	From OAS; catalogable
Invocation	instruments/name over JSON-RPC session	Model selects perform; app executes	HTTP request per OAS op
Orchestration	Host routes throughout many servers/instruments	App-local chaining	Agent/toolkit routes intents → operations
Transport	stdio / HTTP variants	In-band by way of LLM API	HTTP(S) to companies
Portability	Cross-host/server	Vendor-specific floor	Vendor-neutral contracts

Strengths and Limits

MCP

• Strengths: Standardized discovery; reusable servers; multi-tool orchestration; rising host help (e.g., Semantic Kernel, Cursor; Windows integration plans).
• Limits: Requires operating servers and host coverage (id, consent, sandboxing). Host should implement session lifecycle and routing.

Function Calling

• Strengths: Lowest integration overhead; quick management loop; simple validation by way of JSON Schema.
• Limits: App-local catalogs; portability requires redefinition per vendor; restricted built-in discovery/governance.

OpenAPI Tools

• Strengths: Mature contracts; safety schemes (OAuth2, keys) in-spec; wealthy tooling (brokers from OAS).
• Limits: OAS defines HTTP contracts, not agentic management loops—you continue to want an orchestrator/host.

Security and Governance

• MCP: Enforce host coverage (allowed servers, person consent), per-tool scopes, and ephemeral credentials. Platform adoption (e.g., Windows) emphasizes registry management and consent prompts.
• Function Calling: Validate model-produced args in opposition to schemas; preserve allowlists; log requires audit.
• OpenAPI Tools: Use OAS safety schemes, gateways, and schema-driven validation; constrain toolkits that permit arbitrary requests.

Ecosystem Signals (Portability/Adoption)

• MCP hosts/servers: Supported in Microsoft Semantic Kernel (host + server roles) and Cursor (MCP listing, IDE integration); Microsoft signaled Windows-level help.
• Function Calling: Broadly accessible throughout main LLM APIs (OpenAI docs proven right here) with related patterns (schema, choice, software outcomes).
• OpenAPI Tools: Multiple agent stacks auto-generate instruments from OAS (LangChain Python/JS).

Decision Rules (When to Use Which)

1. App-local automations with a handful of actions and tight latency targets → Function Calling. Keep definitions small, validate strictly, and unit-test the loop.
2. Cross-runtime portability and shared integrations (brokers, IDEs, desktops, backends) → MCP. Standardized discovery and invocation throughout hosts; reuse servers throughout merchandise.
3. Enterprise estates of HTTP companies needing contracts, safety schemes, and governance → OpenAPI Tools with an orchestrator. Use OAS because the supply of reality; generate instruments, implement gateways.
4. Hybrid sample (widespread): Keep OAS on your companies; expose them by way of an MCP server for portability, or mount a subset as perform calls for latency-critical product surfaces.

---

References:

MCP (Model Context Protocol)

• https://modelcontextprotocol.io/
• https://www.anthropic.com/news/model-context-protocol
• https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/concepts/tools
• https://modelcontextprotocol.io/legacy/concepts/tools
• https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol
• https://developers.openai.com/apps-sdk/concepts/mcp-server/
• https://devblogs.microsoft.com/semantic-kernel/semantic-kernel-adds-model-context-protocol-mcp-support-for-python/
• https://devblogs.microsoft.com/semantic-kernel/integrating-model-context-protocol-tools-with-semantic-kernel-a-step-by-step-guide/
• https://cursor.com/docs/context/mcp
• https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/semantic-kernel/concepts/kernel

Function Calling (LLM tool-calling options)

• https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/function-calling
• https://platform.openai.com/docs/assistants/tools/function-calling
• https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8555517-function-calling-in-the-openai-api
• https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/tool-use
• https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/agents-and-tools/tool-use/overview
• https://docs.aws.amazon.com/bedrock/latest/userguide/model-parameters-anthropic-claude-messages-tool-use.html

OpenAPI (spec + LLM toolchains)

• https://spec.openapis.org/oas/v3.1.0.html
• https://swagger.io/specification/
• https://www.openapis.org/blog/2021/02/18/openapi-specification-3-1-released
• https://python.langchain.com/docs/integrations/tools/openapi/
• https://python.langchain.com/api_reference/community/agent_toolkits/langchain_community.agent_toolkits.openapi.toolkit.OpenAPIToolkit.html
• https://docs.langchain.com/oss/javascript/integrations/tools/openapi
• https://js.langchain.com/docs/integrations/toolkits/openapi

The submit Model Context Protocol (MCP) vs Function Calling vs OpenAPI Tools — When to Use Each? appeared first on MarkTechPost.